Friday, September 28, 2018

Review: U – July 22


U – July 22 (2018): Written by Anna Bache-Wiig and Siv Rajendram Eliassen, directed by Erik Poppe.  Starring: Andrea Berntzen, Brede Fristad, Elli Rhiannon Mueller Osbourne, and Solveig Koloen Birkeland.  Running Time: 90 minutes. 

Rating: 3.5/4


            This movie is one of, and possibly the, most singularly difficult experiences I’ve had watching a movie this year.  U – July 22, a recreation of the July 22nd terrorist attacks by a Christian extremist that took over 70 lives, is both a remarkable technical achievement in immersive filmmaking and a deeply provocative and disturbing work meant to provoke endless debate over how terrorism, extremism, and violence can and should be depicted on-screen. 

            The film focuses on the second of what was ultimately a two-pronged attack by the terrorist (I refuse to put that devil’s name in print).  After detonating a car bomb in the government quarter of Oslo, the terrorist bluffed his way onto an island hosting a youth gathering organized by the country’s leading political party.  Once on the island, he began shooting.  This second attack lasted for exactly 72 minutes before help arrived, and in addition to the 8 people killed in the earlier bombing, over the course of the hour plus he was on the island he shot and killed 69 more people (nearly all teenagers).  Hundreds more were either injured or later suffered from symptoms of severe trauma and PTSD. 

            With the exception of an opening montage depicting the bombing, the film focuses almost exclusively on the second attack, featuring a nearly-single-take shot (there are a few cheat edits that an experienced editor might spot) that takes the viewer through the entirety of the 72-minute shooting.  While the exact events depicted were based on exhaustive interviews with over 40 survivors to ensure accuracy, the characters we follow are fictional. 

            What I find most notable (and, in the end, most laudable) about the film is that it is laser-focused on the children, on the victims of one man’s twisted ideology and dreams of a race war sweeping the West.  The shooter is only glimpsed a handful of times, a vague, Slenderman-esque figure at the very back of the shot.  We never see his face, we never hear his name.  No psychoanalysis or tortured hand-wringing over why right-wring extremism exists or the Fall of the West.  Just a bunch of scared, innocent children, experiencing one of the worst traumas anyone can ever experience, struggling to survive, knowing they did nothing to deserve this. 

            No film I have yet seen does such a thoroughly effective (and, as a result, shattering) job of forcing a viewer to, as much as is possible, gain some feeling for what it actually is like to be caught in a mass shooting.  The news reports and heated debates and think pieces that follow in the wake of each new American slaughter quickly become cold, distant, clinical, bloodless.  No one boasting of the benefits of good guys with guns, of the clear and obvious need for just one person to stand up, morph into Liam Neeson, and turn hero, has every actually been in such a situation where shots ring out, no one knows what’s what, and the deepest of survival instincts take over.  No one, except those who have, and they know better than to make hollow boasts.             

            This staggering effect is achieved first and foremost through the camerawork- the lens through which we view everything practically functions as a person in and of itself, one of the children running, ducking, running, glancing behind us, hiding, then running, over and over again.  Each gunshot- hundreds and hundreds of them, land like hammer blows on the ears, sending shots of instant, cold, reptilian fear up the spine. 

            Most of the time we are close to the face of our main protagonist, Katja (played by Andrea Berntzen).  When she is hiding in some bushes, our vision is filled with leaves and branches.  When she thinks she sees the murderer and presses herself into the ground, the camera sinks into the mud with her.  When she runs, we run.  When she stumbles, we stumble.  This intense and utterly unbroken intimacy places the burden of carrying this astounding experiment on the shoulders of Berntzen, who proves herself more than up to the Herculean task.  Her performance deserves to be considered one of the most definitive breakout performances of 2018, regardless of what one thinks about the movie itself.    

            Whether or not this film, or any film about the July 22nd attacks (another one by director Paul Greengrass is set to hit Netflix later this year), can be considered appropriate and worthwhile, or can only ever be an unethical, exploitative commercialization of tragedy, is a question that I am in absolutely no position to answer definitively.  That said, the context of the production and intention of the film must, in my view, be taken into account.  In this case, the film’s writing and production involved feedback and input from survivors and families of victims from the start, including having some of the survivors on-set during filming to ensure accuracy and a psychologist on hand to help the cast handle the stress of filming.  While there has certainly been opposition to and criticism of the film, the reaction within Norway has (to my knowledge) been largely positive.  For me, that is enough to be able to consider this movie as more than just a piece of crass exploitation. 

            The devotion of the film to being an experience rather than just a documentary means that, for many, it will fall short of what most people consider an “entertaining” or “informative” film.  A viewer going in with no prior knowledge of the attacks will likely be extremely confused the whole time, and will leave no better informed, because this is not a movie meant to relate facts.  Since most of the children had no choice during the attack than to stay in one place as long as they felt safe enough, large chunks of the film are spent in a stationary spot with Katja, either alone or with others, stuck against a tree or a rock wall, trying to wait out the attack long enough until they feel forced by circumstance to move again and find another safe spot.  These long stretches are in no way conventionally cinematic- almost none of the film’s notable sequences are- but again, this is not trying to be a conventional film.  It seeks to be an experience, to drive home the despairing, helpless feeling of lying face-down in the Earth, praying for safe passage through the storm, not knowing where to turn next, and in this, it succeeds astoundingly well. 
           
            While I did say earlier that the movie does not directly deal with the sort of right-wing ideologies that inspire terrorism, the director found a remarkably powerful way of indirectly refuting every argument that most right-wing movements try to make about Western society without anyone ever having to say it out loud.  When most people think of Norway (or Sweden, or Denmark, or pretty much every Northern European country), they immediately picture someplace almost entirely homogenously white and Christian.  This is certainly the image of Norway that the attacker believes in, and what motivated the attacks in the first place.  The students and young adults who are to become his victims, however, are of various races and religions, with one Muslim character openly worrying about the possibility the bombing was done by Al-Qaeda and that he will face even more discrimination in society than he already does.  Boys and girls of every shape, size, and color gather together, try to comfort each other, and try to survive.  This simple fact of the film alone, absent any explicit commentary, is a stunning rebuke to the mindset of such depraved persons who would look at such a gathering and decry it as the downfall of humanity. 

            U – July 22 is a hard film, a powerful film, a profoundly heart-rending experience that not everyone will have the strength for.  For those who do, or at least hope they do, it is one of the year’s most essential viewing experiences.  Forget the sick ideologies of hate.  Forget the sad debates that insist on a “both sides” in debates about guns and killing.  Forget the pettiness of politics.  Focus on reminding yourself that, in the end, those who bear the ultimate cost for such hate and ignorance are the young, the unblemished, the innocent, those who would otherwise offer us a better tomorrow.  They are worth more of your time, consideration, and effort than any nutjob with a shaved head and a Napoleon complex. 

-Noah Franc

No comments:

Post a Comment